Leaderboard

In month of october when tata indicom rebanded into tata docomo, there was also annoucement regarding new product launched Tata Photon Max, bases on EVDO rev B, http://www.rimweb.in...post__p__246352 http://telecomtalk.info/ttsl-launches-photon-max-rev-b-evdo-services-on-tata-docomo/80075/ at that time coevreage were limted to only mumbai, chennai, delhi(not include NCR) and kolkata. but from 1st feb, website got updated, now showing it cover all metro and most of tier I cities in india, although Banglore is not there. http://photon.tatado...stpay.aspx#tab2 State Photon Max Cities Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Bihar Patna Delhi Delhi Gujarat Ahmedabad, Vadodra, Mundra Kerala Ernakulam, Trivandrum Maharashtra Mumbai Punjab Chandigarh, Jalandhar, Amritsar Tamil Nadu Chennai UPE Kanpur, Lucknow West Bengal Kolkata Currently product available only with postpay connection and Tariff plan are very limited Device supplied is Huawei Ec306 model, which is capable of delivering 14.7 Mbps with using EVDO rev B phase II network and 3 slot of 1.25Mhz device cost rs 1999 with minimum rent of rs 750. also device bundle offer of device with 5 month advance rent plan available at rs Rs3999. Regarding evdo rev b, tata has choosen only Phase I, where two channels 1.25Mhz spectrum is used to get max speed of 6.2=2* 3.1 Mbps. As tata have enough spectrum in most circle, so they can afford it, But MTS which lunched EVDO rev B phase II (Mblaze Ultra) only in rajasthan, where thay have more than 1.25Mhz spectum For details Toll Free Customer Care number 1800-266-121 exclusively for our Photon Max customers. Rcom is still waiting and struggling with 2G scam case, Termination of it's top official like Mr Syed Safawi, and Debt of 3G spectrum.

This is something amazing ! May be revolutionary. Reason: No DVR is coming with attach-your-own HDD. There are reviews available on the net where people tried to fix their own HDD but it didnt work because of proprietary hardware. Secondly, no DVR has the capability to copy the recordings and they have their own filesystem which prohibit you to do the same. In this, since HDD is detachable and may be with knows file system, you can always do that. This opens up another possibility - play recordings on any machine, which is lacking in any other DVR. Fake company ??? - How ? May be your perception. We used Dish for since 2002 before going to TATA Sky just 3 months back just because HD DVR was not available with Dish. it's just HD box with USB port, and software update, which enable recording. - True. And no other company provides that facility because then they cannot loot you. This feature should be considered as revolutionary in that sense. there is nothing in Set top box to record live content, - The first post states contrary to this. Have you checked the set top box on your own ? You need buy external USB pen drive or HDD to record.- And that is the reason that the set top box is priced at Rs. 2690 unlike to Tata Sky or Airtel which are Rs. 6000 with Max 500 GB recording. compared to current tata sky +HD or airtel HD {DVR}, it no where in competiton. - I agree. No offence, but this revolutionary product cannot match the tactics employed by Tata and Airtel. I have both of them. You cannot play a recording once you unsubscribe to the channel from where you recorded in these two. Desclaimer : I am not employee, dealer or vendor of Dish. Neither I am holding any position in Dish TV through shares or Futures/Options. I am using Airtel DVR at Pune and Tata Sky HD+ at Ahmedabad.

You started with praising the judgment but concluded by slamming the judgment. I can understand this duality which I've seen in most of the normal onlookers of this case. Judgement runs along the chord which says that TRAI's recommendation is flawed which simply implies that FCFS is a wrong policy.(In that sense, your statement straight away rejects the Judgment)If that has to taken, then all licences issued from 2001 must be cancelled without any distinction. If we assume that Mr. Raja has done wrong implementation, The CBI has clearly identified the set of licenses which falls in this category. Then only those licenses should have been cancelled. This judgment looks like childish master yelling at his servants that "all are fired" on some major provaction. For this 'non-sense', you don't need judges sitting on the papers for so long. This could have been delivered as soon as Mr. Raja was chargesheeted. Are we becoming a foolish judiciary where judgments are driven by media pressure?? Where is Cheif Justice of India???? Is he sleeping?? What is his opinion on this non-sense?? Here is a judgment which neither Judges nor the parties to case could explain to the nation.