Jump to content
Reliance Jio & Reliance Mobile Discussion Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Arun

Tata Communications Directed To Pay Damages To Reliance Communications

Recommended Posts

1 Sep, 2008, 1555 hrs IST, IANS

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the global arbitration tribunal, has directed Tata Communications to pay a Reliance Communication subsidiary approximately $19 million plus interest from May 2006 as damages over a cable dispute.

"In the matter of the ICC arbitration proceedings brought by Reliance Globalcom Ltd ("Reliance"), formerly known as 'Flag Telecom', against Tata Communications Ltd, the Tribunal has, on August 27, 2008, handed down a final award dealing with the issue of damages," Tata Communications said in a statement Monday.

"The Tribunal has directed Tata Communications to pay Reliance a sum of approximately $19 million plus interest from May 2006 as damages, against the $385 million sum claimed by Reliance," the statement added.

Tata Communications said this was the tribunal's final award in the ICC arbitration proceedings over a dispute regarding FEA (Flag Europe Asia) cable, ongoing since 2004.

The dispute between the two companies goes back a few years, when FLAG accused the then state-owned Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd or VSNL - now Tata Communications - of denying it free access to its cable landing station and thereby having a monopolistic hold on bandwidth prices.

FLAG wanted access for enhancing the capacity of the FEA cable system from 10 Gbps to 80 Gbps. (Gbps stands for "billions of bits per second" and is a measure of bandwidth on a digital data transmission medium such as optical fibre).

However, VSNL said it was not under obligation to grant access under the construction and maintenance agreement between the two parties.

The dispute culminated in FLAG referring the matter to the ICC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arbitration panel asks Tata to pay $19 million in damages to Reliance Communication

NEW DELHI: Tata Communications has been directed by the global arbitration tribunal to pay 19 million dollars plus interest as damages over a cable dispute two years ago.

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the global arbitration tribunal, has directed Tata Communications to pay Reliance Communication subsidiary about 19 million dollars plus interest from May 2006 as damages over a cable dispute.

"In the matter of the ICC arbitration proceedings brought by Reliance Globalcom Ltd, formerly known as Flag Telecom, against Tata Communications Ltd, the Tribunal has on August 27, 2008 handed down a final award dealing with the issue of damages," Tata Communications said in a regulatory filing today.

"The tribunal has directed Tata Communications to pay Reliance a sum of approximately 19 million dollars plus interest from May 2006 as damages against the 385 million dollars sum claimed by Reliance," the company said in a BSE filing.

Tata Communications said this was the tribunal's final award in the ICC arbitration proceedings over a dispute regarding Flag Europe Asia (FEA) cable ongoing since 2004. The dispute between the two companies goes back a few years, when FLAG accused the then state-owned Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd (VSNL) -- now Tata Communications -- of denying it free access to its cable landing station and thereby having a monopolistic hold on bandwidth prices.

FLAG wanted access for enhancing the capacity of FEA cable system from 10 Gbps to 80 Gbps. However, VSNL said it was not under obligation to grant access under the construction and maintenance agreement. The dispute culminated in FLAG referring the matter to the ICC.

Tata Communications lost its appeal against FLAG (now part of Reliance Globalcom) in April this year and the court held that Tata Com would be ordered to pay the cost of proceedings.

The Court in its April 2008 order stated: ''In connection with determining the amount of cost to be awarded in favour of FLAG, the court will consider the underlying substantive interest of the case.

Both parties indicated during arguments that the underlying substantive interest amounts to about 400 million dollars.

src: ET

balle balle anil bhaiya .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×