Please suggest between Motorola Quench Xt3 Or Samsung Galaxy3

[swapnil05in 2]

pleeseeeeeeeee help.................

i m confused with the specs on gsmarena

[raccoon 53]

Why not also consider the new LG Optimus One?

[Karthik R 246]

Now you confused him even more!

[raccoon 53]

   Lol, true! I guess the magnitude of confusion is directly proportional to the range of choices available.  

But I'm confused that he has included the HTC. Dosen't fit with the other 2 choices.

[rajanmehta 4,056]

Swapnil Let me end your confusion. Going to be C.A. soon!! Your job is to confuse your clients not to get confused yourself!!

Points of Differentiation between Motorola Quench XT3 and Samsung Galaxy 3

Android Version is same 2.1 in both.

Processor: Moto 600 Mhz Samsung 667 Mhz. Wonder how much difference this will have on performance?

Screen Size 3.2" same.

Display Resolution: Moto 320x480 Samsung 240x400 Moto Wins Comprehensively

Screen Colors: Moto 262K Samsung 16 Million Samsung Wins theoretically but human eye is not so capable yet to differntiate the exact details

3G Moto HSDPA 7.2 Mbps Samsung HSDPA 3.6Mbps Moto wins

Wi-Fi Moto 802.11 b/g Samsung 802.11 b/g/n n Standard support in Samsung purely theoretical. Don't have any practical value.

Bluetooth: Moto V2.0 with A2DP Samsung V3.0 with A2DP Again V3.0 not much of a help in practical terms.

Camera: Moto 3.2 MP Fixed Focus Samsung 3.15MP with Autofocus Flash in Moto No Flash in Samsung.

Video Recording: Moto 320x480 at 15fps Samsung QVGA at 15fps Moto Wins.

GPS: A-GPS in both

Battery: Moto 1270mAH Samsung 1500mAH

Talk Time: Moto 492 Minutes (GSM) 384 Minutes (WCDMA) Samsung 910 Minutes (GSM) 430 Minutes (WCDMA) Manufacturer Claimed

Standby: Moto Upto 560 Hours(GSM) Upto 545 Hours(WCDMA) Samsung Upto 625 Hours (GSM) Upto 483 Hours (WCDMA) Manufacturer Claimed

Samsung has better battery.

So the verdict:

If you don't mind absence of Flash in Camera, lower 3G Speed, low display resolution, QVGA video recording, and value battery life as a prime criteria, Go for Samsung Galaxy 3.

Otherwise Motorola Quench XT3.

Edited November 24, 2010 by rajanmehta

[Honest 836]

^^^

Wow, Great Comparison.

Swapnil Bhai....apki confusion toh ek dum duuuuuur ker di Rajan Bhai ne.

Hope, now you will easily take the decision.

[swapnil05in 2]

Swapnil Let me end your confusion. Going to be C.A. soon!! Your job is to confuse your clients not to get confused yourself!!

Points of Differentiation between Motorola Quench XT3 and Samsung Galaxy 3

Android Version is same 2.1 in both.

Processor: Moto 600 Mhz Samsung 667 Mhz. Wonder how much difference this will have on performance?

Screen Size 3.2" same.

Display Resolution: Moto 320x480 Samsung 240x400 Moto Wins Comprehensively

Screen Colors: Moto 262K Samsung 16 Million Samsung Wins theoretically but human eye is not so capable yet to differntiate the exact details

3G Moto HSDPA 7.2 Mbps Samsung HSDPA 3.6Mbps Moto wins

Wi-Fi Moto 802.11 b/g Samsung 802.11 b/g/n n Standard support in Samsung purely theoretical. Don't have any practical value.

Bluetooth: Moto V2.0 with A2DP Samsung V3.0 with A2DP Again V3.0 not much of a help in practical terms.

Camera: Moto 3.2 MP Fixed Focus Samsung 3.15MP with Autofocus Flash in Moto No Flash in Samsung.

Video Recording: Moto 320x480 at 15fps Samsung QVGA at 15fps Moto Wins.

GPS: A-GPS in both

Battery: Moto 1270mAH Samsung 1500mAH

Talk Time: Moto 492 Minutes (GSM) 384 Minutes (WCDMA) Samsung 910 Minutes (GSM) 430 Minutes (WCDMA) Manufacturer Claimed

Standby: Moto Upto 560 Hours(GSM) Upto 545 Hours(WCDMA) Samsung Upto 625 Hours (GSM) Upto 483 Hours (WCDMA) Manufacturer Claimed

Samsung has better battery.

So the verdict:

If you don't mind absence of Flash in Camera, lower 3G Speed, low display resolution, QVGA video recording, and value battery life as a prime criteria, Go for Samsung Galaxy 3.

Otherwise Motorola Quench XT3.

thank you RAJAN BHAI

[rohan_4ever20 8]

+1 for rajan ,great way to explain......

[tarun_kabra 204]

Swapnil Let me end your confusion. Going to be C.A. soon!! Your job is to confuse your clients not to get confused yourself!!

Not true Rajan bhai, its not a CA's job. A good CA ends up all confusion, be it of clients' or of his own. Don't mislead him

anyway, a very good comparison.

[rajanmehta 4,056]

Not true Rajan bhai, its not a CA's job. A good CA ends up all confusion, be it of clients' or of his own. Don't mislead him

anyway, a very good comparison.

Just for a little smile Dear Tarun कभी कभी अपने आप पे थोडा मुस्कुरा लेने से उम्र लम्बी होती है और बॉडी अच्छा रहता है