abhay 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2005 guys i was watching the board stats a few mins back which read Most Online In One Day Is 197 On October 19th, 2005. Most users ever online was 361 on Jun 7 2005, 11:07 PM should'nt most online in one day be == 361 on Jun 7 2005 or am i looking @ it from a diffrent point of view Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rEdshiFt 1 Report post Posted November 5, 2005 interesting... i had asked the exact same question to Arun sometime ago ! there WAS an explanation... forgot what !! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jayant 0 Report post Posted November 6, 2005 I guess thats bcz the stats which show 197 users with id's is not IPB's default stat and Rimweb installed some mod for that stats so those stats are of the days after that mod/hack was installed. Where as the other stats are since rimweb was launched (thats just what i think about those stats ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arun 795 Report post Posted November 6, 2005 Not really Jayant, the "Most Online" mod doesn't count the guests. "Most users ever online was 361 on Jun 7 2005, 11:07 PM" - indicates the most number of users (members and guests) online during an interval of 15 minutes, which occured on the above mentioned date. (Though the surge happened due to search bots hitting the website as per the logs) "Most Online In One Day Is 197 On October 19th, 2005" - indicates the date (24 hours time frame) on which the most number of members (guests not counted) logged into the forum (ie., 197 members on October 19th, 2005). Both are different, and the latter one is a mod. Redshift, I think I've explained it to you through PM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abhay 0 Report post Posted November 6, 2005 so u mean to say that fom 361 members on that perticular day @ that perticular time interval 1) guest users were more than more 119 2) rimweb members were less than 197 did i get it right now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arun 795 Report post Posted November 7, 2005 No, both the statistics have no relation between them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abhay 0 Report post Posted November 7, 2005 No, both the statistics have no relation between them. 46106[/snapback] 4 a day i thought i undersottd this mess y could.t u just kepp it that way Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RajanPERT 0 Report post Posted November 7, 2005 I think arun description is more descriptive and informative. And there is no chance of confusion. Thanks and Take Care! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abhay 0 Report post Posted November 7, 2005 I think arun description is more descriptive and informative. And there is no chance of confusion.Thanks and Take Care! 46124[/snapback] i too think the same but it was just soo much easiear back then when i thought i had got it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
