Arun 795 Report post Posted December 18, 2005 Three is equal to four.... Theorem: 3=4 Proof: Suppose: a + b = c This can also be written as: 4a - 3a + 4b - 3b = 4c - 3c After reorganizing: 4a + 4b - 4c = 3a + 3b - 3c Take the constants out of the brackets: 4 * (a+b-c) = 3 * (a+b-c) Remove the same term left and right: 4 = 3 Four is equal to five Theorem: 4 = 5 Proof: -20 = -20 16 - 36 = 25 - 45 4^2 - 9*4 = 5^2 - 9*5 4^2 - 9*4 + 81/4 = 5^2 - 9*5 + 81/4 (4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2 4 - 9/2 = 5 - 9/2 4 = 5 Howzat ?!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ramchi 0 Report post Posted December 18, 2005 Good one You may all know this: With one strike you need to solve this equation: 5+5 = 545 By adjusting only one digit in the following equation you need to solve: 102 - 2 = 98 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Puneet 0 Report post Posted December 18, 2005 4 * (a+b-c) = 3 * (a+b-c) This is a fallacy. Since a+b=c, a+b-c=0. The above equality holds only because both the sides are zero. And when a multiplication by zero term is involved, you cannot equate the coefficient of the terms. This would amount to saying 1*0 = 0, and also 10000000000* 0 = 0 hence, 1 = 10000000000 (or whatever). (4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^24 - 9/2 = 5 - 9/2 4 = 5 (4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2 = 0.25 Square roots of 0.25 are +/- 0.5 Similarly, square roots of (4 - 9/2)^2 are +/- (4 - 9/2) and (5 - 9/2)^2 are = +/-(5 - 9/2)^2. 4-9/2 = -0.5 and 5-/2=0.5. You are equating the wrong roots. Correct way would be -(4-9/2)=(5-9/2) or (4-9/2)=-(5-9/2) Expanding the brackets in one of the above -4 + 9/2 = 5 -9/2, perfectly correct and now you cannot cancel out 9/2, hence 4 is not equal to 5. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashoksoft 83 Report post Posted December 18, 2005 IIT brains at work Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supernova 47 Report post Posted December 18, 2005 really a good theorm and a nice reply.........i mailed this to all my friends Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abhay 0 Report post Posted December 18, 2005 (edited) hmm good one Edited December 18, 2005 by abhay Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rEdshiFt 1 Report post Posted December 19, 2005 sharp, puneet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Puneet 0 Report post Posted December 19, 2005 IIT brains at work We used to solve these kinda things while I was in class XI. Long ago, and I was not an IITian then sharp, puneet Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashoksoft 83 Report post Posted December 19, 2005 wonder what in puneet is sharp Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ani_meher 42 Report post Posted December 20, 2005 (edited) Good oneYou may all know this: With one strike you need to solve this equation: 5+5 = 545 By adjusting only one digit in the following equation you need to solve: 102 - 2 = 98 The answer of first one is, draw one verticle line to the top left of + sign, so it becomes 4, like it is _|_ , draw a line to make it |_|_ , ie 4. (pls ignore the 'i's in next line. It's not taking spaces. i i i i i | i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i | As for the second one, I guess the 'adjusting' is making the 2 as 4. ie 102 - 4 = 98. But I am not sure about this one. Edited December 20, 2005 by ani_meher Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SexyGurl 0 Report post Posted December 20, 2005 Good one You may all know this: With one strike you need to solve this equation: 5+5 = 545 By adjusting only one digit in the following equation you need to solve: 102 - 2 = 98 The answer of first one is, draw one verticle line to the top left of + sign, so it becomes 4, like it is _|_ , draw a line to make it |_|_ , ie 4. (pls ignore the 'i's in next line. It's not taking spaces. i i i i i | i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i | As for the second one, I guess the 'adjusting' is making the 2 as 4. ie 102 - 4 = 98. But I am not sure about this one. I think, he meant just moving around the digits, not changing a digit... so it's very likely: 10^2 - 2 = 98 (i.e. just move the 2 in 102 to the exponent). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ani_meher 42 Report post Posted December 20, 2005 I think, he meant just moving around the digits, not changing a digit... so it's very likely:10^2 - 2 = 98 (i.e. just move the 2 in 102 to the exponent). Yes, this seems to be the right answer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ramchi 0 Report post Posted December 20, 2005 SexyGurl & Ani Mehar both are correct!!!! Keep it up! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites